中方人员与意大利方人员关于意大利隔震专项监理体制来往邮件中文翻译
杜：贵国的隔震专项监理体制是什么样的性质？后面有关的几个问题想请你给与回答。
M：更准确的说,我们正在谈论的是工程师信任控制的正确建设和改造,包括产品和安装的减震隔震装置,从建设开始直到全部完成的工作(即与安全有关的非结构构件的安装，结构构造缝及气体管道的防护,等等)。
1.专项监理体制是如何工作的？
据意大利法律和抗震规范, 建筑的业主必须指定这样的工程师。
什么样的人可以做专项监理，在他成为监理师之前需要一些特殊的证书吗?有些人可以同时是设计师和监理师吗?
上述专项监理工程师应该是绝对没有参与设计的人。根据现行的抗震规范，没有要求有特别的资质，但是意大利议会有一个推荐性的要求，就是他必须是该一领域的专家（正如从2003年到2008年新的意大利抗震规范最初版本指定的一样）。
专项监理的费用由谁负责？
建筑的业主应该为上述专项监理工程师付费。应支付报酬的具体金额在一些专门针对这类工作的规章中有详细的规定。
4.如果专项监理师发现在施工现场有异常现象，他该向谁报告？
当工程竣工时，上述工程师应该写一份关于建筑结构安全性的证明，并应该把它交给业主。业主应该向负责结构安全管理的国家有关部门提供这份证明。
5.在施工期间，专项监理师以什么样的频度查看施工现场？
每当他认为有必要的时候都应该去工地现场检查。在任何情况下，要检查隔震器下部的结构是否正确施工，要检查减震隔震装置是否做了进场检测（在这类检测所实施的试验室），检查减震隔震装置是否正确安装，检查减震隔震装置以上部的结构构件是否正确施工，检查上述与结构安全性相关的非结构构件是否正确安装。在结构竣工时，专项监理工程师的检查资料提交最终的验收。
6. 你如何从总体上看待这个专项监理体制？它对防止设计和建造过程中出错有效吗？
只有当上述工程师是一个真正的专家，这个体制就是有效的。根据意大利议会的最新建议，上述工程师应当是一个真正的专家。施工完工后遗留问题将在竣工后的一年里进行整改。因为这个原因，意大利议会也建议专项监理工程师提供的结构安全证书应包含在结构使用寿命期间内的有关结构检查、维护的指令和建议。（例如，可以看我在索契会议上提到的论文）
中方人员与意大利方人员关于意大利隔震专项监理体制邮件来往原文
How does that system of checking work for isolation technique
Dear Dr Martelli and Dr Clemente
In your application of the isolation techniques, I frequently heard of the term “ checking”. I am curious in your checking system for the application of the isolation.
1. How does that system of checking work?
2. Who can be the person to do the checking, do the checkers need to have some special certificate before he can be checkers? Can someone be the designer and at the same time the checker?
3. Who pays for the checking?
4. Whom do the checkers report to if he found something unusual on the construction site?
5. How frequently do the checkers visit the construction site during the construction?
6. How do you think of this system checking in general? Is it effective in preventing of doing wrong things in the design and/or construction process?
Yongfeng DU
Dear Yongfeng,
below you find my answers.
Best regards,
Alessandro
--------------
At 15.19 06/03/2012, dooyf@sohu.com wrote:
Dear Dr Martelli and Dr Clemente
In your application of the isolation techniques, I frequently heard of the term
a?? checkinga??. I am curious in your checking system for the application of the isolation.
More precisely, we are talking of an engineer entrusted for the control of the correct construction or retrofit, including the production and installation of the anti-seismic devices, from the beginning of the construction to the full completion of the works (i.e. installation of even non-structural members which are safety-related, like the protection of structural gaps, gas pipes, etc.).
1. How does that system of checking work?
According to the Italian law and seismic code, the owner of the structure has to appoint such an engineer.
2. Who can be the person to do the checking, do the checkers need to have
some special certificate before he can be checkers? Can someone be the designer and at the same time the checker?
The aforesaid engineer shall be somebody who was had absolutely NO involvement in the design. According the present seismic code, no special qualification is needed, but there is a recommendation of the Italian Parliament that he shall be an expert in the field (as it was specified by the initial version of the new Italian seismic code, from 2003 to 2008).
3. Who pays for the checking?
The owner of the structure shall pay the aforesaid engineer. The due amount of money is specified in detail by specific regulations for this kind of job.
4. Whom do the checkers report to if he found something unusual on the
construction site?
When the works are fully completed, the aforesaid engineer has to write a certificate on the structural safety of the construction and shall give it to the owner. The latter shall provide this certificate to the State authorities which are charged for the control of structures safety. The structure can be used only after this certificate has been provided to such authorities.
5. How frequently do the checkers visit the construction site during the construction?
Every time he judges this necessary. In any case, to check that the structure below the isolators is correctly erected, to check the acceptance tests of the antiseismic devices (in the laboratories where such tests are performed), to check that they are correctly installed, to check that the structural elements above the devices are correctly erected, to check that the safety related non structural elements mentioned above are correctly installed, and at the full completion of the structure, for the final inspection.
6. How do you think of this system checking in general? Is it effective in preventing of doing wrong things in the design and/or construction process?
This system is effective only if the aforesaid engineer is a real expert, as recently recommended by the Italian Parliament. The problem remains for interventions which may be made on the structure in the next years. For this reason, the Italian Parliament also recommended that the structural safety certificate of the aforesaid engineer also contains prescriptions and recommendations on inspection, maintenance, etc. during the structure life (see, for instance, the paper that I presented at the Sochi conference).
Yongfeng DU
